Sino-US trade disputes from the power of strategic thinking to see

 Sino-US trade disputes from the power of strategic thinking to see
80% of world trade is trade within multinational companies, and foreign investment has taken control of nearly 60% of China's export trade, and nearly 90% of high-tech exports, if China talks in the trade with the U.S. multinational investment in China deficit increased sharply, the two sides on the issue of trade friction intensified, the United States began in China more and more pressure exerted .2005 July, a slight appreciation of the RMB, and failed to inhibit the rapid growth momentum of China's exports. According to Chinese statistics, In 2005, China's exports to the U.S. 1,629 billion dollars and imports 48.73 billion U.S. dollars, surplus of 1,141.7 billion U.S. dollars, higher than China's overall trade surplus. U.S. statistics showed that in 2005, the U.S. trade deficit with China surged 24.5%, reaching a 2,016 billion U.S. dollars recorded.
In fact, since the second half of last year, general forecasts on all aspects of the U.S. trade deficit with China of more than 2,000 current billion, which caused an uproar in the United States to require China to take tough measures voices heard. U.S. Senate proposal to cancel the permanent normal trade relations status to China, and all Chinese products a 27.5% tariff to force appreciation of the renminbi, the proposal will soon be put to the vote.
in the domestic part strong pressure from industry and Congress, the U.S. Government has recently released two reports, one is the United States Trade Representative (USTR) submitted entitled The report announced the establishment of ensure the establishment of a so-called more through intervention in the foreign exchange market to prevent appreciation of the renminbi that China should be for the United States last year's record 7,258 billion global trade deficit is partly to blame.
China is the first to admit there is a huge trade surplus with the United States the fact, then pointed out that the two very different figures is derived from the different statistical standards; then to a series of numbers that narrow the U.S. trade deficit with the Chinese government made a lot of effort, the United States through trade and investment from China was a great (in fact much larger than China ) economic interests, which are mutually beneficial and win-win China-US economic and trade relations, the two sides broadly balanced distribution of benefits. the Chinese have called > United States US-China trade has brought great benefits to its well known fact that the same. According to Morgan. Stanley, a study, U.S. consumers purchased over the past 10 years due to cheap Chinese products save 6,000 billion U.S. dollars. There U.S. experts, many labeled Since the U.S. imports from Asia in their share of trade remained at 38%, the only difference is the largest importer of China, Japan has now become (according to In the above problem, whether it is statistical different views on the caliber, or on their own economic interests on the tacit knowledge, the two countries is nothing new for the original topic. For the United States, a Foreign hegemony of within a pluralist democracy, the borrowing of domestic political pressure to politicize economic and trade issues in order to manipulate the international economic relations, has long been adept at diplomacy. Since the last two years the U.S. trade deficit with China increased too fast, has reached a certain the limits of mental endurance, combined with the Japan bashing), as the no benefit.
China in dealing with the U.S. (and EU) on the issue of trade disputes practice is that although the difficult to develop the aircraft industry in China will result in vicious competition within the aviation industry. Secondly, the economic and political pressure to upgrade the passive situation. In essence, this situation is to fully join the economic globalization after China, the status in the international division of labor established by the international trade structure of the decision. because China to maintain rapid economic growth, bound to be a large number of industrial investment, thus becoming the world's largest low-tech products and exporting countries, and multinational companies actively integrates China into their global production and marketing network, and further led to the surge in international trade in China. For research indicates that if the net trade association within multinational corporations, in 2005, the U.S. trade deficit with China fell by 30%.
transnational corporations in international trade, the special importance of Sino-US trade disputes to resolve the important insight provided . because 80% of world trade is trade within multinational companies, and foreign investment has taken control of nearly 60% of China's export trade, and nearly 90% of high-tech exports, so if the China trade issues in the negotiations with the U.S. multinational Investment in China trade, RMB appreciation will lead to the import decline in raw material costs, and thus has little effect on their exports, while domestic industries are mainly engaged in general trade, the general trend of appreciation will have seriously weakened the competitiveness of domestic industries, resulting in domestic demand further decline. Second, China can take a tough U.S. approach negotiations, warned the United States to drastically reduce the trade deficit with China is actually very simple, it is U.S. investment in China China's restrictions, so far by one of the few billions of dollars in order to reduce the bulk of the Chinese Government to be more effective than the U.S. trade deficit, since even according to China's statistics, 30% of the loss of related party transactions which means that the U.S. trade deficit with China will be reduced by about 34 billion U.S. dollars.
U.S. bound to accuse the Chinese to do so is a violation of the commitments in the WTO agreements, the principles of investment liberalization, China may take the opportunity to renegotiate the WTO requires the relevant content, in particular, by repealing The agreement on the implementation of China's industrial promotion policy of independence constitutes a significant legal obstacles, so far, very few countries in the world signed the agreement, if China were determined to be the shackles of this agreement. So, the deadlock appeared, forcing the United States Ruoyin RMB appreciation on Chinese imports failed the implementation of a comprehensive tariff restrictions, the Chinese can completely fulfill U.S. obligations under WTO on the grounds that implementation of a comprehensive U.S. investment in China prohibited or strictly limited.
this will shake the world's two great country full of economic trade war between the will not happen, will be determined and China have close interest in the attitude of American business. If the United States unprofitable enterprises in China, the balance will naturally tend to profit there a company more than their profit margins in the world (from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce data). It is precisely to facilitate U.S. business in China to use the tremendous energy of domestic politics, oppression of the U.S. government to mobilize American business adopt a rational attitude to really reach between China and the Diplomacy is only a tool to promote national interests, and then clever diplomacy can not resolve in the international division of labor in China, the disadvantages caused to the Chinese economic and political system in the international strategic situation in the passive. China is to achieve national prosperity, must be properly way to join the economic globalization, China for the rules of the international economic and political system should only take make the best use of the policy, but how controlling the economic globalization, so that services in China's industrial revitalization and the goal of industrialization, so as to change China in the international division of labor position, rather than swallowed by economic globalization, we need to grasp the rules, use rules, especially rules when necessary to overcome the rules can be. Of course, external factors must be internal factors come into play, a big country like China, the country's fundamental need to rely on the revitalization of strong domestic demand support, but to overcome the negative factors lead to weak domestic demand, just need to state the various systems of improvement and innovation. Does not this show that no matter what the prospects of Sino-US trade war, from China's long-term interests, China will completely get rid of the current economic and trade on the predicament that requires forward-looking strategic br>